some would say traditional media was effectively brought upon our humble earth in 1447 by the invention of the almighty printing press, by a little idol of mine by the name of johann gutenberg. mass media on an analogue form had been born and the western world embraced it more than any other, with just over 45% of its population regularly partaking in the readership of newspapers in 1810, little before world war I. alongside the wake of the industrial revolution, the world had now hooked onto the airwaves to take advantage of a precious commodity named the radio. invented in 1895 by guglielmo marconi, this was the first time individuals and families alike could tune into real-time mass media and keep one step ahead of the tabloids. traditional media made a large leap in 1926 when the first television was successfully demonstrated by john logie baird. this now put the visual and audio media together to create a moving image with stereo sound. this essentially brought about the widespread broadcasting of real-time mass media and with every house on average in the uk having a television set it appears to have been the most successful traditional media to date.
the world wide web was a concept developed by the us army using internet protocol as a form of identifying a web address anywhere in the world, providing it’s listed on the dns database governed by the it standards commission ieee. in 1989 it was the british scientist sir tim berners-lee and his fellow belgian scientist robert cailliau whom submitted their proposal for the wide availability of the world wide web, and it was from this we saw the birth of the information superhighway that we have come accustomed to today. the internet has seen some of the world’s largest organisations grow such as amazon, ebay, facebook and youtube, all of which are completely reliant on its invention to power its basic business model. the advantages of the internet were seen by businesses alike in the late 90’s, with relatively low start-up fees and cheaper running costs it was widely realised that this was the new form of high street store, now commonly known as e-commerce. communication was revolutionised with the birth of true graphical user interface instant messaging in the mid 90’s with icq, allowing real-time textual messaging using p2p protocol on proprietary code streams. as webcams became more sophisticated and widespread in the millennium with facial recognition and faster usb 2.0 speeds, video conferencing began to make its way throughout the communication industry offering yet another interactive way in which clients can communicate, a typical feature of web 2.0.
so, has the world wide web interrupted the steady flow of traditional media? well, in my opinion, it’s clearly a judgement of what generation one belongs to, and to what extent this service impacts the life of someone. on a personal level I have grown up and matured with the internet, my father is a top level it support technician and my chosen industry centres on this service. however, for those whom have either no access to the world wide web or are at an age to which such technologies appear too much of a hurdle or burden, it is an impossible task to experience this service and therefore traditional media for them would be very much the norm for them. in contrast, those of a younger age such as myself are vast supporters of information sharing over the world wide web, actively participating in such activities of social networking sites such as facebook. in regards to the middle-aged generation, I believe the world wide web only plays a part if a certain agenda is stated such as booking a holiday or holding a skype conference, and if that person has a career that requires basic it skills.
why do I mention such demographics in this essay, well, it is my true belief that traditional media is only threatened by those whom actively use the world wide web to an average-high level, and generally a median of middle-aged adults and the younger generation. this, of course, has proven to have a large effect on the media business, but what the statistics show is that loyal customers do not suddenly switch to an alternative form of collecting such media. through personal experience I have seen people who are very loyal to various forms of traditional media, but what i find interesting is the dabbling between keeping with their analogue or dab radio and using the world wide web to watch eastenders on the bbc iplayer. these people are invariably middle aged adults whom have been caught in the middle of the technological age circa 1970’s, and this would seem to be a very fragile audience to persuasion from the mass media as they merge into the world wide web. in regards to the younger generations, statistically 90% of them use the internet to reference all existing forms of traditional media via its alternative digital form, pointing towards a sudden and clear shift to what could be a future wipe out from traditional media.
it has been proven that traditional media is on the decline, with newspapers declaring bankruptcy upon a sudden drop in advertising and revenue, and past radio listeners moving to visual alternatives. newspapers are not only seen as traditional media, but as old news, and in an age in which news is reported by the minute I can sympathetically understand. in addition, television has had its revenue hit hard too, with advertising at rock bottom as viewers move online broadcasters have been forced to look to new ways to find extra income. phone-in shows have been vastly adopted throughout a large host of channels to capture the interactivity of the new breed of socialites by charging a fee for the privilege. some channels have begun to adopt gambling during their empty late slots to gain extra revenue, pushing the boundaries to what is deemed to be moral.
as traditional media appears to be on its last decade or two, we have seen the world wide web develop into the information highway. the vast majority of us travel on it every day to gain an enhanced experience and prompt service that delivers free and updated information on an ad-hoc basis, giving us control over what we want and when we want it. interactivity is the new buzz word in the world wide web, and something that promises to be the key element to the upcoming web 3.0. great anticipation follows the unveiling of web 3.0 in late 2010, which promises to incorporate new javascript and html 5 coding scripts that will go towards enhancing the web experience for those that choose to opt for new media as opposed to traditional media.
in conclusion, traditional media is being hit hard, and despite some reports I found in my research of those whom claim there is no change, I feel both my statistics and knowledge are enough to counter these claims. the fact is, traditional media cannot go any further without a revolution in how it communicates to its consumers, because they will always opt for the unique rawness of having something that is exclusive, something that has been made for you, whether that be a television set or newspaper; it’s not one web page that is universal to billions of citizens around this earth. I personally feel a great loss, being in the generation who have kick started the blitz of traditional media, as i know nothing in the world wide web can replace the dedication, quality and investment that goes into making this personalised traditional media for my consumption. however, the world wide web hosts an age that pushes the boundaries every year, in a world where the technology is still growing and always delivers. it’s given me access to information I wouldn’t have been able to previously, and allows me to interact with this information in a dynamic and creative way. online advertising is strong in this industry, and so long as its integrity and custom is always adhered to, then the world wide web has nothing to fear. traditional media is web 1.0 quality; there simply is no way in which it can catch up as web 3.0 makes its debut in the months to come.
51.214127
-0.795706